<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Working Differently With Canonical Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techwyse.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/canonical-links-and-duplicate-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/canonical-links-and-duplicate-content/</link>
	<description>Learn, Educate &#38; Rise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duplicate Content Problems &#38; Solutions For SEO &#124; Rise to the Top Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/canonical-links-and-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-32911</link>
		<dc:creator>Duplicate Content Problems &#38; Solutions For SEO &#124; Rise to the Top Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/?p=1408#comment-32911</guid>
		<description>[...] Google, Yahoo! and MSN had recently come up with a solution for this issue by introducing the &#8220;canonical&#8221; attribute for the rel element. [rel=&#8221;canonical&#8221;]. You can insert this tag in the header of all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google, Yahoo! and MSN had recently come up with a solution for this issue by introducing the &ldquo;canonical&rdquo; attribute for the rel element. [rel=&rdquo;canonical&rdquo;]. You can insert this tag in the header of all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grette</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/canonical-links-and-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-22597</link>
		<dc:creator>Grette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/?p=1408#comment-22597</guid>
		<description>Hello C-note, Thanks for the great article. This is all a little confusing actually. Matt Cutts&#039; explanation had cleared the fog a bit.
Lots of this seo stuff can be confusing and there are so many little things to know about to do it right.
Please keep the good info coming. It is greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello C-note, Thanks for the great article. This is all a little confusing actually. Matt Cutts&#8217; explanation had cleared the fog a bit.<br />
Lots of this seo stuff can be confusing and there are so many little things to know about to do it right.<br />
Please keep the good info coming. It is greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/canonical-links-and-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-22077</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/?p=1408#comment-22077</guid>
		<description>It was interesting to hear Matt Cutts interviewed on this. One of the ways Google deals with duplicate content is by use of the sitemap.xml, the XML version that we upload. It’s definitely worth doing properly simply because it also allows us to set the prominence of the pages , using a sliding scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was interesting to hear Matt Cutts interviewed on this. One of the ways Google deals with duplicate content is by use of the sitemap.xml, the XML version that we upload. It’s definitely worth doing properly simply because it also allows us to set the prominence of the pages , using a sliding scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

