<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechWyse Announces Release of GPABLO Google Analytics Code Scan &amp; Broken Link Verification Tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/</link>
	<description>Learn, Educate &#38; Rise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your 5 Item Daily SEM Health Check &#124; Rise to the Top Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-35253</link>
		<dc:creator>Your 5 Item Daily SEM Health Check &#124; Rise to the Top Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-35253</guid>
		<description>[...] in your site. You can also accomplish this job by doing a scan of your broken links using the&#160;GPABLO&#160;tool mentioned [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in your site. You can also accomplish this job by doing a scan of your broken links using the&nbsp;GPABLO&nbsp;tool mentioned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-33240</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-33240</guid>
		<description>HI Charlie,

Last time I checked we are all live in a free world with lots of possibilities!  Should GM and Chysler have ever started doing business becuase Ford already built the first car?  Absolutely not.

Stay tuned to this tool and you will see lots of fun and exciting enhancements that we felt were not available in the current analytics world.  

Analytics is still in its infancy and we certainly want to be one of the companies contributing to this movement.  Bless EPIK and SiteScanGA for being as innovative as they are.  But the existence of their tool does not mean no one else can build there own, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Charlie,</p>
<p>Last time I checked we are all live in a free world with lots of possibilities!  Should GM and Chysler have ever started doing business becuase Ford already built the first car?  Absolutely not.</p>
<p>Stay tuned to this tool and you will see lots of fun and exciting enhancements that we felt were not available in the current analytics world.  </p>
<p>Analytics is still in its infancy and we certainly want to be one of the companies contributing to this movement.  Bless EPIK and SiteScanGA for being as innovative as they are.  But the existence of their tool does not mean no one else can build there own, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prashant</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-31274</link>
		<dc:creator>Prashant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-31274</guid>
		<description>It reports Urchin and GA.js together as correct when, in fact, the 2 may be in conflict. - &lt;em&gt;The scan is run in automatic mode so it will check for both codes. And in your case if it has detected both codes I would advise you to remove the unnecessary one. Your suggestion however is thought provoking and we will take this scenario into consideration when updating the scan engine. Thanks for pointing this out.&lt;/em&gt;

The similarity between GPABLO’s interface and email and SiteScan’s shows a blatant copy of SiteScan. Since GPABLO cannot copy SiteScan’s code, I wonder just how little effort has gone in to GPABLO. - &lt;em&gt;I think I will limit my answers to the main purpose for which the scan was created. a.) The original plan was to use it for scanning our client sites for proper analytics integration b.) Our SEO team pondered if we could polish it a bit and add a broken link checker to further assist them c.) Seeing it as a potential tool that can help others and at the same time help us in improving it based on user inputs prompted us to make it public.

On lighter note similarities will be very obvious as we are trying to achieve the same thing as sitescanga is doing. Ensure your site has proper analytics code configured. But we assure you that we trying best to see how things can be improved upon and am sure the people at sitescanga are doing the same thing.
&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reports Urchin and GA.js together as correct when, in fact, the 2 may be in conflict. &#8211; <em>The scan is run in automatic mode so it will check for both codes. And in your case if it has detected both codes I would advise you to remove the unnecessary one. Your suggestion however is thought provoking and we will take this scenario into consideration when updating the scan engine. Thanks for pointing this out.</em></p>
<p>The similarity between GPABLO’s interface and email and SiteScan’s shows a blatant copy of SiteScan. Since GPABLO cannot copy SiteScan’s code, I wonder just how little effort has gone in to GPABLO. &#8211; <em>I think I will limit my answers to the main purpose for which the scan was created. a.) The original plan was to use it for scanning our client sites for proper analytics integration b.) Our SEO team pondered if we could polish it a bit and add a broken link checker to further assist them c.) Seeing it as a potential tool that can help others and at the same time help us in improving it based on user inputs prompted us to make it public.</p>
<p>On lighter note similarities will be very obvious as we are trying to achieve the same thing as sitescanga is doing. Ensure your site has proper analytics code configured. But we assure you that we trying best to see how things can be improved upon and am sure the people at sitescanga are doing the same thing.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie A</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-31243</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-31243</guid>
		<description>This tool is redundant and misleading.
Redundant because it repeats (copies?) functionality already existing in www.SiteScanGA.com and (including broken links) (do a search for broken links for a ton of others) and misleading because it is full of false positives and false negatives.

It reports Urchin and GA.js together as correct when, in fact, the 2 may be in conflict.

The similarity between GPABLO&#039;s interface and email and SiteScan&#039;s shows a blatant copy of SiteScan. Since GPABLO cannot copy SiteScan&#039;s code, I wonder just how little effort has gone in to GPABLO.

Charlie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tool is redundant and misleading.<br />
Redundant because it repeats (copies?) functionality already existing in http://www.SiteScanGA.com and (including broken links) (do a search for broken links for a ton of others) and misleading because it is full of false positives and false negatives.</p>
<p>It reports Urchin and GA.js together as correct when, in fact, the 2 may be in conflict.</p>
<p>The similarity between GPABLO&#8217;s interface and email and SiteScan&#8217;s shows a blatant copy of SiteScan. Since GPABLO cannot copy SiteScan&#8217;s code, I wonder just how little effort has gone in to GPABLO.</p>
<p>Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-24098</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-24098</guid>
		<description>You make a great comment Britt.  I actually wrote an email recently to someone that asked mentioned that tool www.sitescanga.com. So let me address why we went ahead and built this tool.  

There are certain limitations that SiteScanGa has such as time between scans, limits on number of scans and waiting time.  Since we are a GAAC and have a full development team we decided to build our own tool that didn&#039;t have these limitations.

Further to this, we also have a firm vision of many more features that we would like to add in the future.  Once we are out of BETA we will begin making these additions and everyone will see the vision we have for this tool.  Hopefully www.gpablo.com accomplishes this!  We think it will.

Do you remember when only Yahoo! existed in the search engine community?  Then Google came along and it pushed the search engine community to continually improve.  We are not comparing ourselves to Google by any means, but we do see a need to continually push the envelope on a tool like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a great comment Britt.  I actually wrote an email recently to someone that asked mentioned that tool http://www.sitescanga.com. So let me address why we went ahead and built this tool.  </p>
<p>There are certain limitations that SiteScanGa has such as time between scans, limits on number of scans and waiting time.  Since we are a GAAC and have a full development team we decided to build our own tool that didn&#8217;t have these limitations.</p>
<p>Further to this, we also have a firm vision of many more features that we would like to add in the future.  Once we are out of BETA we will begin making these additions and everyone will see the vision we have for this tool.  Hopefully http://www.gpablo.com accomplishes this!  We think it will.</p>
<p>Do you remember when only Yahoo! existed in the search engine community?  Then Google came along and it pushed the search engine community to continually improve.  We are not comparing ourselves to Google by any means, but we do see a need to continually push the envelope on a tool like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-24024</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-24024</guid>
		<description>Sorry Mobs,
that was Brittany who responded.
It would still be interesting if someone were to try both and compare them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Mobs,<br />
that was Brittany who responded.<br />
It would still be interesting if someone were to try both and compare them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-24022</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-24022</guid>
		<description>Mobs, 
since the gpablo tool is free, try both and give a critique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobs,<br />
since the gpablo tool is free, try both and give a critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-23861</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-23861</guid>
		<description>I saw another Google Analytics site scan tool online called www.sitescanga.com and I think it may be a good idea to help explain what makes www.gpablo.com different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw another Google Analytics site scan tool online called http://www.sitescanga.com and I think it may be a good idea to help explain what makes http://www.gpablo.com different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobs</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-21400</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-21400</guid>
		<description>wow. I got my report.

DJ, you rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. I got my report.</p>
<p>DJ, you rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo/comment-page-1/#comment-21354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwyse.com/blog/press-releases/techwyse-announces-release-of-gpablo-google-analytics-code-scan-broken-link-verification-tool/#comment-21354</guid>
		<description>Hola, this is a clean cute tool. 
Wow how fast, it checked analytics code of all 247 pages of my site, very fast indeed compared to other similar applications.
Cheers guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola, this is a clean cute tool.<br />
Wow how fast, it checked analytics code of all 247 pages of my site, very fast indeed compared to other similar applications.<br />
Cheers guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

